🍺Friday Free Bet: Prop Bet for Bengals/Steelers

TNF Recap, Connor's free prop play, a look at possible teaser legs for the weekend and some news catchup

Sponsored by

Rams: My entire Twitter feed was 800 versions of “The Rams are the team NO ONE wants to see in the playoffs”. I agree. The offense is humming along and the weaknesses of the three top teams are secondary and coverage issues. Hell, I think the Buccaneers fall into this category too! The NFC playoffs could get weird as hell right off the bat. Just a great game by Stafford and the luxury of Puka being able to step up like that is so massive for a team that was thought of as an also-ran in the NFC this summer.

Saints: At the risk of sounding like my kids, I just can’t with Derek Carr anymore. The sacks he took on 3rd and 4th down on the first two drives made me seriously question the integrity of the concussion protocol.

He made some good throws as well. Of course, he did! That’s how he’s managed to keep a starting job this long, he has the tools in the bag but somehow makes his backup look like the smart one. The gameplan was tough outside of any time Olave was involved and the coaching decisions were questionable. I would be fine without this team in my playoff viewing experience.

Playoff Implications: I ran some sims after the game and I’m not quite as aggressive as the market for the Saints missing the playoffs, likely because of just how high leverage their games are (Bucs and Saints). Even at 7-8, there’s a path with Minnesota and Seattle as the likely roadblocks. It’s low, but they aren’t dead.

The Rams took a big jump up and probably just need to take care of business versus the Giants next week in New Jersey. I’m a little more bullish than the market currently, making it closer to 75% that they take one of the two open wildcard spots. SF resting players in week 18 would just be gravy, although it’s not like they have a shot to move up past the sixth seed (lost to both Dallas and Philly, so head-to-head tiebreakers would play).

Gambling: I thought I was going to nab a first-TD scorer win on that little 3rd down out to the pylon, but alas the pass was a little off-target for Kupp. Getting the over 46 and our halftime bet on the Saints pk (never in doubt) home on the same TD was nice.

Clear. Concise. Unbiased. 1440's FREE newsletter.

Tired of news with a slant? Struggle to find the truth in a sea of sources? Get a daily dose of unbiased facts with 1440. Explore various topics like politics, business, and science. Be part of the 3 million informed Americans every morning.

Last week Connor got off a mini cold streak and got us a winner fading Desmond Ridder against the Panthers. He’s going a different direction this week and betting ON a player in an offense who’s a little rough around the edges:

Jaylen Warren over 68.5 rushing and receiving yards -115

Warren is set up for success this week. He had a season-high 55% of the backfield touches last week and now draws the Bengals who are allowing over 4.5 yards per carry, are 27th in explosive run rate allowed, and 28th in rushing success rate allowed. They were bad on a play-to-play basis BEFORE losing run-stuffing DT DJ Reader. This is a massive deal as they have allowed over 5.5 yards per carry on the 109 snaps without Reader so far this season (H/T Rich Hribar/TruMedia there). With Mason Rudolph at QB, I expect them to lean on the run in neutral or positive game scripts.

The issue is, Rudolph presents a level of variance that makes me more interested in the combined yardage. If they fall behind and are forced to throw it more, a rushing and receiving ticket is much, much stronger. Warren is coming off a season-high in route participation (83%) and on the year has a 28% target per route run rate. If they fall behind, Warren will get all of the work as the pass-catcher. I would also expect multiple designed receptions for Warren as a solid base. He has 3 designed targets each of the last three weeks. This sets a solid pass-catching floor even in positive game scripts.

Connor Allen, 4for4.com

Follow Connor on Twitter for more NFL betting content, and get in the 4for4 Discord if you want to see everything he’s betting each week.

Live Stream!

If you’re stuck at the office this afternoon, you may as well tune in. No one is going to answer that email you’re sending, add some prop bets for the weekend instead.

Live at 3 pm EST, check it out:

Not much last week and I got caught with my hand in the cookie jar with the Cowboys. I ranked them highly, used it in a Sunday play and the teaser leg never had a chance! Funnily enough, the one I was terrified of (KC -8) covered fairly easily.

This Week there are a ton of games JUST out of range and it leaves me with a pretty short list. The Steelers, Titans, Vikings, Commanders Cowboys, & Broncos are all right on the edge of being teaseable.

Buffalo isn’t a Wong teaser, but in a situation where Easton Stick is once again the QB, I’m willing to use it as a nice spot for them to cruise this week.

Anyone vs. Atlanta is a teaser leg since those games always seem to be close late.

Jacksonville and Houston are tough hangs with Keenum and possibly Beathard. I suppose the arguments would be that Tampa is still missing some defensive players and Cleveland’s D has played worse on the road.

Week 16 Teaser Rankings (Best to Worst)

Buffalo -12.5 at LA Chargers (teased down to -6.5)

Indy +2.5 at Atlanta (teased up to +8.5)

Jacksonville +2.5 at Tampa (teased up to +8.5)

Houston +2.5 vs Cleveland (teased up to +8.5)

Injury News Dump 🤕

What’s on the Docket for Sunday Saturday?

Again, a bit of a weird week, so I’ll send out a short one tomorrow looking at the stand-alone games we have been blessed with. I had a nice betting week last week despite getting skunked on anything I took in Saturday’s newsletter, so I suppose I’m due for some winners tomorrow.

Feeling Generous this Holiday Season? I don’t want your money, I have a job.

But, if you could do me a favor or two, I wouldn’t complain:

  • Check out today’s sponsor, give them a click

  • Share the newsletter with someone: